It’s 1996. Sixteen-year-old Emma
has just received her first desktop computer when her neighbor and good friend
Josh stops by with an America Online free install disk. The two upload the
program, create an email account for Emma, and a small blue box appears in the
middle of the screen asking for a repeat Emma’s login information, a webpage
pops up, filled with pictures and text, its logo says it’s called Facebook, and
the year on the page is now.
Needless to say, Josh and Emma are looking at their future.
They spend the rest of the book trying to understand the actions that led to
the lives they see on their pages, and in Emma’s case trying to change, and
change, and change the life she doesn’t think she wants. I’ll start of with saying
that this is a seriously cool premise. I too got America Online in ’96, and at
15, if I saw my current Facebook page who knows what I would change or I how
would feel about the path my life has taken in the 15 years between. That was
the part of this plot that had me picking up this book in the first place (that
and the fact that Jay Asher’s Thirteen Reasons Why was both brilliant and
devastating). Here’s the past that I had trouble with; the plot devises, to me
became a way for the authors to drop in frequent, and often unnecessary
references to fads and culture that took me out of the story. Instead of
focusing on the action I found myself saying “Oh, yeah, Oasis’ Wonderwall, I
remember the first time I heard that” or “we used to rollerblade or skateboard
everywhere, I remember when [insert skater friend’s name here] used the wax for
my surfboard to wax the curb in front of my house so he could grind on it” or
“I remember my Discman, it was so awesome, I could even hook it up to my car
with this cool cassette adaptor”. You
see, the authors know that these things were part of the 90’s teenage life, but
instead of incorporating them briefly and seamlessly into the text, it felt
forced—like they said to each other, “Hey, remember this? We gotta drop that
in.” It’s as though they are forcing their own nostalgia on their young
prospective readers. Oddly enough, I checked their ages, and if Wikipedia is
correct they are 36 and 38 respectively, which takes them just out of reach of
the teens they have created. So, it’s not even really their own teenage
nostalgia, they would have been in their 20’s in 1996. Please don’t think this
means that authors need to create characters in their own age-span, that is
ridiculous, and we, quite frankly would be missing out on a bevy of amazing
novels if that were the case. What I’m trying to say, is that the pop culture
references are so forced, it makes it seem like the authors can’t help, but
reminisce on what it was like to be a teen in 1996, so to find out that they
are beyond the age range was a little confusing to me.
Here’s another issue I had. The nostalgia seems to call to
people my age, but the writing, and the character building is a bit weak,
skimming the surface, where it could easily go deeper, but also it’s very specifically
aimed at today’s teens. It is not a crossover, the writing and characters are
not compelling enough for adult readers, the content clearly young adult, but
the nuts and bolts of the writing—primarily the constant presence of pop
culture appears to be aimed at the 30 somethings. It’s like they wrote the book
for us and then took out the meat, and packaged it for teens. The thing is,
teens love the meat. They like complex stories and characters just as much as
adults do, and I’m trying to figure out if they can read this book, which can’t
quite decide who it’s audience is, and enjoy it, without a lot of eye rolling.
So my question is—can teens enjoy this book? Maybe. The
meddling with your future aspect of the novel is appealing and interesting, so
perhaps that is what will catch their eyes and minds. Perhaps I’m biased
because I couldn’t get past my own nostalgia of the era, so it became a
roadblock in my enjoyment of the text. Am I blind to the entertainment because
of this? I think that is very well possible. Yet I can’t help thinking that the
lack of depth to the characters, the mere brushes with real deep emotion and
conflict is something that presents an actual problem with the text, and is a
bit of an insult to young adult readers who have grown accustomed to more
complexity in their reading.
In short, am I wrong in my assessment? What I would really
like is for a teen to read The Future of Us and give me feedback. I want to
know if the nostalgia really is an overused prop that does nothing to propel
the story excepting of course, the dawn of the internet age and America Online.
I would be remiss if I did not mention that this element is truly essential to
the story and does capture the nuances of the old dial-up platform very well.
Here’s my call to action—if you are a teen and you read this
book, please send my your own review or just a few thoughts. I really want to
know how you view this book. Am I just the wrong age to enjoy it for what it
is? Comment back with your thoughts, for once, I actually want to hear what
everyone else is thinking.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
No comments:
Post a Comment